UP.02.AR_6

Nudity is proposed as a boundary to cross in order to solve current social problems. It is understood that nudity is a boundary because it is censored, censored for being considered obscene, and obscene for being interpreted as sexual. This analysis starts from the premise that nudity is not inherently sexual for both genders. Rather, due to physiological reasons, this association is a masculine concept.

Likewise, in trying to satisfy his sexual needs, he would discover that the media presents women to him as sexual objects for his consumption and satisfaction, provoking in him the feeling of excessive sexual power. On the other hand, the woman, who does not feel arousal from nudity, when faced with its censorship, and her sexuality and nudity only in a typified and objectified way, would experience the loss of sexual identity and subsequently objectification. This hierarchy of sexual powers is what gives rise to abuses.

Moroccan procedence

Romanian procedence

United Kingdom procedence

German procedence

Prohibitory & discriminatory

Prohibitory

Semi-prohibitive

Prohibition of nudity according to municipal ordinances on coexistence.

Each dot represents 10 migrants. Data extracted from the Andalusian Government.

That is, it is men who receive sexual arousal through visual stimuli. Therefore, when nudity is considered obscene for being sexual, we are talking about male sexuality as hegemonic sexuality. This would lead to women being the main victims of objectification, along with the problems that this entails.

In the graph of nudity censorship versus "sexual dignities," the situation of two people of opposite genders confronting their sexuality and nudity is presented. The man, who does feel sexual arousal from nudity, would eroticize it even more upon seeing it censored, leading to its perversion.